![]() And the app is free to download! So why does it cost $3.99 to buy what is essentially a feature-poor version of a popular app that costs nothing?Īnd then I got a flashback to my childhood. Pac-Man app costs $3.99!įor comparison, the Pac-Man Plus Tournaments app goes far beyond classic Pac-Man, offering dozens of different mazes, daily missions, and weekly-or-so tournaments where you get to compete against other users for leaderboard dominance. Everything seems pretty standard and simple - in fact, it reminds me of what the Pac-Man Plus Tournaments app used to be like 5+ years ago. Pac-Man on your phone in all of its original glory, with some optional in-app purchases for things like extra lives, and that's about it. I decided to check it out to see if it was worth a download. Pac-Man games still on store shelves.I was in the Google Play Store recently to install Pac-Man Plus Tournaments on a new device when I happened to notice that Bandai-Namco also offers an official Ms. Luckily for retro arcade fans, there are already a number of licensed Ms. To wit, is so irritated by the fact that AtGames has entered into a contract with the GCC Individuals-an arrangement BNEA hoped to exploit for its own benefit through deceit and bad faith-that it has ordered its lawyers to attack AtGames by any means possible."Īs the complicated case winds its way through the courts, it seems unlikely anyone will be able to navigate the licensing issues at play and release any new official Ms. In its lawsuit, Bandai Namco says it never approved the release of those modified NES versions, and it cites this as an example of AtGames' "improper and wrongful conduct." Advertisementįurther Reading MAME for the masses? “Legends” arcade cabinet could thread that needleIn a letter obtained by Polygon, AtGames' lawyer called Bandai Namco's lawsuit "another transparent effort to punish AtGames for entering into its August 2019 agreement with the GCC individuals, to sully AtGames’ reputation, to disrupt AtGames’ business relationships and to artificially manufacture leverage in the ongoing negotiations between the parties. ![]() That early review version contained authentic emulated arcade ROMs of a selection of Namco classics, while the final release contained only downgraded NES versions ("The early review version could not make it to production, even though it was anticipated it would," AtGames said in a tweet at the time). The company has a reputation in the game industry for bargain-basement retro hardware releases like the Sega Genesis Flashback console (which preceded the much-improved Sega Genesis Mini that AtGames had nothing to do with).ĪtGames was also embroiled in controversy last year when it sent a misleading version of its Bandai Namco Flashback plug-and-play console to reviewers. AtGames alleged bad actsįurther Reading Sega Genesis Mini review: $80 delivers a ton of blast-processing funIf you recognize the name AtGames, it's probably not for good reasons. "As part of our ongoing initiative to be caretakers of important cultural touchstones, we are privileged to gain these valuable rights pertaining to the iconic Ms. That agreement was on the verge of being signed, Bandai Namco says, when AtGames swooped in and acquired GCC's royalty rights for itself this fall. Bally Midway retained the copyright and trademark rights to the game and its characters, though, which Bandai Namco eventually reacquired in the intervening years.Īccording to a federal lawsuit filed by Bandai Namco this week, the company had been negotiating with the successors to that GCC deal in order to "resolve the relationship" the two companies had with the game (presumably to acquire the royalty rights under the Bandai Namco umbrella). ![]() Pac-Man, Diablo dissected by their original devsAs part of the Crazy Otto licensing deal, GCC received the right to a perpetual royalty payment whenever a Ms. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |